No automatic-compliance claim
The platform supports controlled workflows; the regulated company still assesses intended use and validates its configured use.
A transparent framework for evaluating product fit, regulated controls, validation responsibility, security evidence and open actions before a pilot or deployment.
The platform supports controlled workflows; the regulated company still assesses intended use and validates its configured use.
Drafting intelligence supports preparation. Qualified users remain responsible for review, correction, approval and validation decisions.
Security, validation and certification statements are made only when supported by current documentation.
A qualified evaluation should end with a documented view of product fit, control fit, validation responsibilities, available evidence and open actions. Missing certifications or independent reports must remain visible until completed—not replaced by broad compliance language.
Confirm use case and due-diligence scope.
Review current product, validation and technical information.
Record security, legal, validation or configuration gaps.
Proceed to pilot, request remediation or stop.
No. DVS provides controls designed to support a Part 11 and Annex 11 assessment. Compliance depends on intended use, configuration, procedures, infrastructure, validation and ongoing governance.
The regulated company remains responsible for validating its configured intended use and approving release. PHARPRO can provide implementation and validation support.
No. Certifications, independent test reports and licenses are disclosed only when current and verifiable. Any unavailable evidence should be recorded as an evaluation action, not implied.
Yes. Qualified prospects can submit their supplier and technical due-diligence questions for a scoped response.
Start with a focused evaluation. PHARPRO will confirm fit, required controls and the most defensible next step before asking your team to scale.
Request a DVS evaluation